In a significant legal development, an FIR has been filed against Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, BJP national president J.P. Nadda, and others in connection with alleged irregularities in the electoral bond scheme. The complaint accuses the accused of extortion and misuse of the scheme, benefiting from it to the tune of over ₹8,000 crore. The FIR was lodge by the Tilak Nagar police in Bengaluru on September 28, 2024, base on court direction.
Allegations of Extortion and Criminal Conspiracy
The allegations revolve around the misuse of the electoral bond scheme, where it is claim that Nirmala Sitharaman and BJP officials coerce companies into contributing large sums of money through electoral bonds under the threat of enforcement actions. This, according to the FIR, amounts to extortion under Section 384 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Further charges have brought under Section 120B (criminal conspiracy) and Section 34 (acts done with common intention) of the IPC, with the police investigating whether the accuse use enforcement agencies to coerce companies into purchasing electoral bonds, thereby amassing ₹8,000 crore.
Court-Directed FIR in Bengaluru
The FIR against Nirmala Sitharaman and J.P. Nadda was filed after a court directive, following a complaint lodged by an individual who raised concerns about the potential misuse of the electoral bond scheme for illegal financial gains. The case has drawn significant media attention,
with political parties and civil society groups raising concerns about the transparency and accountability of the scheme.
The electoral bond scheme, which was introduce in 2018, allows individuals and companies to make anonymous donations to political parties. While its proponents argue that the scheme ensures clean and transparent political funding, critics have long claim it lacks adequate safeguards and can be misuse for money laundery and other illicit financial activities.
BJP Responds to the FIR
While the opposition has been quick to criticize the accused,
calling for a thorough investigation, the BJP has dismissed the FIR as a politically motivated move aimed at tarnishing the party’s image ahead of upcoming elections. Nirmala Sitharaman and J.P. Nadda have not yet officially responded to the allegations,
but sources suggest they are preparing to contest the charges in court.
The Broader Implications
The case raises significant questions about the functioning of the electoral bond scheme and whether it has misuse powerful political figures for personal gain. The opposition is likely to use the case as a rallying point in the run-up to national elections, focusing on the need for greater transparency and accountability in political funding.
Read More: Hassan Nasrallah Killed in Israeli Airstrike Hezbollah Leader: What’s Next?- Click Here
Conclusion
As the investigation into the FIR against Nirmala Sitharaman, J.P. Nadda,
and other prominent BJP figures unfolds, the spotlight is once again on the controversial electoral bond scheme. Whether the allegations of extortion and criminal conspiracy hold up in court remains to seen,
but this case is likely to have far-reaching political and legal implications.
